Full Maxillary and Partial Mandibular Rehabilitation Using XGATE Dental Multi-Unit Abutments and Implants

Full Maxillary and Partial Mandibular Rehabilitation Using XGATE Dental Multi-Unit Abutments and Implants

A clinical case presented by Dr. Michael Carmy from Rialto, California, USA.

This case study by Dr. Carmy demonstrates a comprehensive approach to full maxillary rehabilitation and partial mandibular restoration using XGATE Dental V-Type multi-unit abutments and implants from multiple systems. The uniqueness of this clinical work lies in the combination of immediate implant placement with the root shield technique — which allowed for maximum bone tissue preservation—and a staged prosthetic approach using a temporary PMMA prosthesis to ensure stable esthetics and comfort throughout the treatment.

Particular attention was paid to optimizing load distribution through the use of low-profile multi-unit abutments and a segmented design for the final zirconia bridges. This approach minimizes the risk of overload and increases the long-term durability of the restoration.

This case exemplifies modern rehabilitation, where XGATE Dental technologies help achieve stable biomechanical outcomes and natural esthetics, even in clinically challenging conditions.

Compatibility Profile
Implant System
DSI, XGATE Dental X3
Platform
Regular Platform (RP)
Connection
Internal Hex
XGATE MUA
V-Type
Clinical Rationale
Small coneLow profilePassive fit

Patient Summary

The patient is a relatively young man in recovery from drug addiction. At the time of his initial consultation, he had been living a healthy lifestyle for three years. Restoring his smile was a high priority, as it is crucial not only for esthetics but also for self-confidence, clear speech, and the ability to maintain a nutritious diet without limitations.

Long-term psychoactive substance use had caused severe xerostomia, contributing to the rapid development of dental caries and decay. The teeth in the upper jaw were non-restorable, and many were already missing. The condition of the lower jaw was slightly better: the anterior teeth were in satisfactory condition, but the posterior teeth were severely decayed and required extraction.

The presented images show the patient’s initial dental condition.

Patient’s initial dental condition showing severe decay and missing teeth in the maxilla and mandible.
Severe dental caries and decay in the posterior segments of the maxilla and mandible due to xerostomia.
Frontal view of the patient’s initial smile showing advanced tooth decay and non-restorable anterior teeth.

The following radiographic images and virtual 3D model provide a comprehensive view of the clinical situation, detailing the condition of the bone tissue and remaining dentition.

Coronal CBCT view detailing initial bone level, remaining dentition, and implant planning considerations.
3D virtual model of the patient’s maxilla and mandible showing extensive bone volume loss in the upper jaw.
Lateral right view of the 3D virtual model detailing the remaining dentition and bone structure.
Lateral left view of the 3D virtual model detailing the posterior segment decay before extraction.

Treatment Plan and Its Adjustment During Execution

The initial plan was to rehabilitate the upper jaw using an All-on-4 protocol with an FP3 Tx prosthesis, which replaces not only the tooth crowns but also the lost gingival (soft) tissue. This approach would have required a significant reduction of the alveolar ridge to accommodate the full-arch prosthesis.

However, after a detailed assessment of the bone volume, height, and density, the decision was made to adjust the treatment plan in favor of a more conservative, bone-preserving strategy.

Stage 1

The implants were placed immediately following tooth extraction. They were positioned subcrestally — 2–3 mm below the bone crest — to allow for anticipated bone remodeling. A total of eight implants were placed in the maxilla and four in the mandible.

Placing the implants into the fresh extraction sockets allowed for optimal positioning for the future prosthetic restoration. The extractions were performed using the root shield technique, which is aimed at maintaining the thickness and height of the buccal and palatal bone walls. This technique, traditionally used for “conservation” even in case of delayed implantation, helps to minimize resorption and preserve the natural morphology of the alveolar ridge.

Post-extraction sockets in the maxilla before immediate implant placement using the root shield technique.
Clinical view demonstrating the preservation of buccal and palatal bone walls using the root shield technique.
Close-up of immediate dental implant placement subcrestally into a fresh extraction socket.

The radiograph shows all eight implants in the maxilla and the four implants in the posterior regions of the mandible. Additionally, granules of a synthetic bone grafting material are visible; this was used to fill extraction sockets to preserve bone volume.

Panoramic radiograph showing eight implants in the maxilla and four in the mandible, with bone grafting visible.

Implant Placement Diagram

Tooth Position (FDI) Implant System Size (Ø x L) and Purpose
#11, #12 XGATE Dental 3.75 x 15.2 mm (Anterior Maxilla)
#34 XGATE Dental 4.2 x 10 mm (Mandibular Premolar)
#16, #26 DSI Implants 5.0 x 10 mm (Molar Region)
#13, #14, #23 DSI Implants 3.75 x 15.2 mm (Anterior/Premolar Region)
#36, #45, #47 DSI Implants 4.2 x 10 mm or 5.0 x 10 mm (Mandibular Region)
Total: 12 Implants 3 XGATE, 9 DSI (Correction: 8 DSI) Optimal Prosthetic Support

Studio render of an XGATE Dental implant used for full-arch maxillary rehabilitation.
Cutaway view of an XGATE Dental implant showing the internal connection.

This distribution provided optimal support for the subsequent orthopedic structure and balanced the load between the posterior and anterior zones.

Implant dimensions were selected based on the patient’s anatomy and the anticipated functional load in each area:

  • Molar region: 5.0 x 10 mm
  • Anterior region: 3.75 x 15.2 mm
  • Mandibular premolar region: 4.2 x 10 mm

For the first two weeks post-surgery, the patient was instructed to follow a soft-liquid diet to promote optimal tissue healing and minimize swelling. Once the mucosa had stabilized and initial healing was complete, the first temporary prosthesis could be delivered.

Stage 2

Two weeks after implant placement, a temporary removable prosthesis was delivered. During this phase, the implants remained non-loaded to allow for undisturbed osseointegration. The prosthesis was carefully designed to support the gingival contours and preserve the interdental papillae, a key factor for achieving optimal esthetics in the final restoration.

Temporary removable prosthesis supporting gingival contours and preserving interdental papillae post-surgery.
Clinical fit of the temporary removable prosthesis two weeks after multi-unit abutment implant placement.

Three months post-implantation, V-Type low-profile multi-unit abutments (0.5 mm and 1 mm) by XGATE Dental were placed. They provide high stability while ensuring excellent esthetics, preventing any metal from showing through the gap between the prosthesis and the gingiva.

XG_USMV-0050
XG_USMV-0001

XGATE Dental specializes in manufacturing modern multi-unit abutments with a high degree of compatibility across various implant systems, making them a versatile and reliable solution for this clinical case.

Occlusal view of the eight XGATE multi-unit abutments placed in the maxilla before impression for the provisional bridge.

A full digital workflow was employed, combining data from an optical scan and a CBCT scan. This provided highly accurate data for the design phase. Using this data in Exocad® software, a long-term provisional prosthesis was designed and milled from reinforced PMMA (see images).

Clinical fit of the long-term milled PMMA provisional prosthesis on the multi-unit abutments.
Occlusal view of the full-arch PMMA provisional bridge showing screw access channels.
Provisional PMMA bridge restoration in the posterior mandible, restoring function and occlusion.

This long-term provisional prosthesis will be worn until the restoration of the posterior mandible is complete and the bone grafts have fully matured.

The planned final maxillary restoration will consist of several independent zirconia bridges. Separating the posterior and anterior segments in this way creates shorter lever arms, which reduces torque and stress on the implants, preventing loosening and overload.

Currently, the patient is wearing the provisional PMMA prosthesis. He is attending regular professional hygiene appointments and adhering to a strict home care regimen. This transitional period allows for the evaluation of the function and esthetics of the PMMA prosthesis, so that any necessary adjustments can be made before fabricating the final restoration, ensuring an optimal outcome.

The patient’s appearance at this stage demonstrates a natural and harmonious result.

The patient’s appearance and natural, harmonious smile achieved with the PMMA provisional restoration.

Download Case Resources

Get the complete case study and explore our product catalog.

We hope you found this clinical case interesting. If you have any questions about the characteristics and delivery of XGATE Dental products, please contact us in any convenient way.

XGATE Dental Group GmbH

Falkensteiner Straße 77,

60322 Frankfurt am Main

Germany

XGATE Dental Inc

350 W Passaic St (3rd floor),

Rochelle Park, NJ 07662

USA

Stay Up to Date

Disclaimer

Clinical cases and articles published on this website are intended for dental professionals and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. They describe the individual experience of the treating clinician and do not constitute medical advice, a treatment recommendation, or a guarantee of outcome. Results depend on patient anatomy, clinical indication, and the technique applied.

XGATE Dental products must be used in accordance with the current Instructions for Use. Product availability and regulatory clearance vary by country; not all products shown are available in every market. Third-party trademarks and implant system names are used solely to indicate dimensional compatibility and remain the property of their respective owners. XGATE Dental is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by these manufacturers.