Prosthetic Materials

Articles on prosthetic materials for implant-supported restorations. The FEA study titanium vs zirconia vs PEEK full-arch frameworks compares stress, deformation and stability on 4 implants; the guide zirconia, lithium disilicate and composites covers single and short-span restorations. Ti-Bases and UCLA abutments for these materials are in Restoration and Ti-Base UNO.

How Implant Material Changes Everything: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Titanium, Zirconia, and PEEK in Full Arch-on-4 Restorations

Before we discuss the study's design and results, let's briefly review the range of multi-unit abutments available for Full Arch-on-4/6 restorations. XGate Dental has developed three types of multi-unit abutments designed for immediate loading protocols like Full Arch-on-4/6: MUA D-type. This is the classic and…

Disclaimer

Clinical cases and articles published on this website are intended for dental professionals and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. They describe the individual experience of the treating clinician and do not constitute medical advice, a treatment recommendation, or a guarantee of outcome. Results depend on patient anatomy, clinical indication, and the technique applied.

XGATE Dental products must be used in accordance with the current Instructions for Use. Product availability and regulatory clearance vary by country; not all products shown are available in every market. Third-party trademarks and implant system names are used solely to indicate dimensional compatibility and remain the property of their respective owners. XGATE Dental is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by these manufacturers.